构式语法视角下的重动句和汉语其他类型动结式的对比研究

VIP免费

3.0 周伟光 2024-09-30 5 4 863.5KB 67 页 15积分

侵权投诉

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

摘要

重动句构式是指谓语动词在同一表达式中重复使用的句式。本文结合

Goldberg的构式语法，探讨了重动句构式的构式形态S+V1+O+V2+C和构式义即

明确表达施事者持续执行或者重复某一动作，从而使受影响者历经变化。此外，

重动句构式的中心义仍在于事件的终结性。根据与此事件终结性一致的不同类型

的补语语义，本文认为重动句构式具有多种衍生义。

通过对重动句构式和汉语其他类型动结式的对比，本文发现两类构式之间的

相似之处。第一，有生或者无生的实施者都可进入两类构式；第二，除情感类动

词外，其他静态动词都不可进入两类构式；第三，两类构式的补语具有相似的语

义指向；第四，两类构式具有相同的构式体。同时，本文也发现了两类构式的不

同之处。第一，动结式会产生歧义，而重动句构式不会；第二，动结式允许及物

动词和不及物动词都可进入构式，但是重动句构式在允许及物动词进入构式的同

时却要求不及物动词必须要符合一定的限制才能进入构式；第三，在重动句构式

中，两个相同的谓语动词表达了同一事件，但是在动结式中，只有一个谓语动词；

第四，事件的持续或者反复在重动句构式中得到明确表述，但是在动结式中，事

件的持续性只是一种隐性意义。

由此可见，重动句构式是动结式的子类型，两者既有相似之处也有不同。

关键词：构式语法；重动构式；汉语动结构式

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

ABSTRACT

Verb-copying Construction (VCC) refers to a construction in which one verb

occurs twice in the same sentence. From the perspective of Goldberg’s Construction

Grammar (CxG), this paper discusses the constructional form of VCC, namely,

S+V1+O+V2+C and its meaning with which the form is paired. The construction

meaning of VCC is that the instigator explicitly sustains or repeats the action event and

the affected one undergoes a change of state. The central sense of VCC still lies in the

telicity of the action event. And according to the semantics of the different varieties of

complements in VCC which is consistent with this telicity meaning of VCC, this paper

holds that VCC has multiple derivative senses.

Through the comparison of VCC and the other types of the Chinese

Verb-Resultative Construction (VRC), this paper reveals the similarities between these

two constructions. Firstly, animate instigator or inanimate instigator are acceptable in

both constructions; secondly, stative verbs are unable to occur as predicate in both

constructions, except for the psychological verbs; thirdly, both constructions exhibit

similar patterns of semantic orientation by the complement; fourthly, both share the

same constructional aspectual constraint. VCC diverges from VRC. According to this

paper, the divergences include: firstly, VRC may have its semantic ambiguity while

VCC is by no means ambiguous; secondly, both transitive verbs and intransitive verbs

are allowed to be fused into VRC while in VCC, intransitive verbs which are allowed to

be fused in VCC are subject to certain constraints; thirdly, in VCC, two predicate verbs

in one and the same form denote the same action event while there is only one predicate

verb in VRC; fourthly, sustainment or repetition of the action event is expressed

explicitly in VCC, coinciding with the constructional form and meaning, but such

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

III

sustainment or enduring happening can only be implied in VRC.

All in all, VCC can be regarded as one subtype of VRC, sharing some properties

with VRC, but differing from it in some other regards.

Key words: Construction Grammar; Verb-Copying Construction; Chinese

Verb-Resultative Construction

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

Contents

Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1

Chapter 1 Literature Review.................................................................................... 3

1.1 Studies on Verb-Copying Construction (VCC) from the Syntactic Perspective 3

1.2 Studies on VCC from the Perspective of Information Structure........................ 7

1.3 Studies on VCC from the Cognitive Perspective ............................................... 8

1.4 Summary...........................................................................................................................14

Chapter 2 Account of Goldberg's Construction Grammar(CxG).............................15

2.1 Theoretical Background of Goldberg's Construction Grammar....................... 15

2.2 Basic Beliefs and Hypotheses of CxG.............................................................. 16

2.3 CxG's Research Methods.................................................................................. 22

2.4 Summary........................................................................................................... 25

Chapter 3 VCC from the Perspective of CxG....................................................... 26

3.1 The Origin of VCC........................................................................................... 26

3.2 Function of the Components in VCC............................................................... 29

3.3 The Form and Meaning of VCC....................................................................... 34

3.4 The Polysemy of VCC...................................................................................... 36

3.5 Summary........................................................................................................... 40

Chapter 4 Comparison of VCC and the Other Types of the Chinese

Verb-Resultative Construction (VRC)........................................................................ 42

4.1 Comparing the Instigator.................................................................................. 42

4.2 Comparing the Predicate .................................................................................. 44

4.3 Comparing the Complement............................................................................. 48

4.4 Sharing One Aspectuality Constraint ............................................................... 52

4.5 Differing in Constructional Semantics ............................................................. 54

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

4.6 Summary........................................................................................................... 55

Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 57

Bibliography.................................................................................................................. 59

Appendix ....................................................................................................................... 63

Acknowledgements....................................................................................................... 64

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

Introduction

1. Significance of the Research

The Chinese Verb-Copying Construction (VCC) has been discussed from the

structural, semantic, pragmatic and functional perspectives up to now. There remain

some questions, however, to be solved and clarified. (1) Goldberg's Construction

Grammar has its significance in cognitive linguistics. Over the last 20 years, many

scholars have devoted themselves to studying it. From this point of view, it is necessary

to identify what VCC is. (2) Each construction is a construction in its own right. It is

essential to prove the constructional status of VCC. (3) Construction Grammar proposes

that each construction is a form-meaning correspondence. The researchers have not

given a clear explanation or analysis on form-meaning correspondence of VCC. This

paper will focus on the study of the form and the constructional meaning of VCC. (4)

As a special type of the Chinese Verb-Resultative Construction (VRC), it is worth

making a comparative study of VCC and the other types of VRC. This paper aims to

accomplish this work and provide a reasonable and convincing explanation.

2. Research Methodology

This paper focuses on a comparative study of VCC and the other types of VRC

from the perspective of CxG. The comparative method is applied throughout the study,

consistent with the cognitive linguistic theory. To check the validity of our findings, the

paper will draw on not only the Chinese language but also the English language.

3. Organization of the Paper

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文

Apart from introduction, the paper consists of the following parts:

Chapter One is the literature review which contains the researches on VCC from

the syntactic, pragmatic and cognitive perspectives.

Chapter Two is intended to briefly study Goldberg's Construction Grammar,

including its basic beliefs and hypotheses, research methods together with its major

contribution in Chinese language research.

Based on the description of VCC, Chapter Three gives a detailed analysis of its

origin, semantic orientation of components, the form and meaning and its polysemous

nature.

Chapter Four focuses on a comparison of VCC and the other types of VRC,

proposing the similarities and differences of these two constructions, and putting

forward the syntactic and semantic constraints on how relevant components can be

fused into the constructions.

The last part is a conclusion of the paper, which summarizes the study, points out

the limitations and provides some advice for the future study.

文档加载中……请稍候！
如果长时间未打开，您也可以点击刷新试试。

下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便

15 积分 4人已下载

立即下载 VIP免费下载

摘要：

浙江财经学院硕士学位论文I摘要重动句构式是指谓语动词在同一表达式中重复使用的句式。本文结合Goldberg的构式语法，探讨了重动句构式的构式形态S+V1+O+V2+C和构式义即明确表达施事者持续执行或者重复某一动作，从而使受影响者历经变化。此外，重动句构式的中心义仍在于事件的终结性。根据与此事件终结性一致的不同类型的补语语义，本文认为重动句构式具有多种衍生义。通过对重动句构式和汉语其他类型动结式的对比，本文发现两类构式之间的相似之处。第一，有生或者无生的实施者都可进入两类构式；第二，除情感类动词外，其他静态动词都不可进入两类构式；第三，两类构式的补语具有相似的语义指向；第四，两类构式具有相同的...

展开>> 收起<<

构式语法视角下的重动句和汉语其他类型动结式的对比研究.pdf

共67页,预览7页

还剩页未读，继续阅读

构式语法视角下的重动句和汉语其他类型动结式的对比研究

相关推荐

开通VIP享超值会员特权

作者详情

相关内容

推荐作者

热门标签

举报选择: